Tags:

Share article:

06 Jul 2023

Assessing the influence of purchasing practices of grocery retailers on producers

Together with Inclsve, Fair & Sustainable Consulting’s Marjoleine Motz did research for GIZ on the influence of purchasing practices by retailers on producers. The report specifically looked at banana suppliers from Ecuador, and cocoa producers in Ghana as examples of two different supply chains, and includes special attention for smallholder producers.

Besides looking at studies done, and at what sustainable standards or ethical fora are advocating as ethical trading relationships, we interviewed different stakeholders like retailers, traders, processors and producers to get their views, and compare them with the desk research. To reach out to a broader audience we also distributed surveys, and held workshops in both countries, to hear the voices of those at origin. Especially the workshops gave us good examples of how purchasing processes develop in practice, what happens when producers invest in more sustainable production and clients find it hard to pay for those efforts, or when clients are unable to pay a price which allows producers to maintain those levels of sustainability. It felt sometimes as if ‘practice what you preach’ was lacking.

On that basis we drafted recommendations regarding sustainable and responsible purchasing practices, with a division of ‘must haves’ and ‘ideal to have’; to show that buyers can develop how they interact with producers and exporters, and see improvements in their sustainability process. These recommendations were discussed with all stakeholders involved to formulate the final version of the study.

The final report can be read here.

Recommended articles

12 Feb 2026

Opportunities for Gender Integration and Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture (NSA) Technical Assistance (TA) Services!

Fair & Sustainable Ethiopia plays a key role as the Local Service Provider (LSP) for IGNITE+ implementation in Ethiopia, leading partnership management and delivering technical assistance services to selected agricultural institutions. We therefore encourage you to partner with the F&S–IGNITE+ project and benefit from systemic growth and strengthened staff capacity in gender integration and NSA promotion. If you believe that partnering with the IGNITE+ project aligns with your mission and organizational goals in advancing gender and nutrition agendas, please contact us.

11 Feb 2026

Building Trust Through Partnership: F&S Journey in Delivering Technical Assistance to African Agricultural Institutions (AAIs).  

Since 2021, Fair and Sustainable (F&S) has partnered with Tanager as its Local Service Provider (LSP) in Ethiopia under the Impacting Gender and Nutrition through Innovative Technical Exchange in Agriculture (IGNITE) project (2018-2024). With the launch of IGNITE+ (2024-2029) which is an extension of the IGNITE project, F&S continues to scale locally led technical assistance for gender and nutrition integration, strengthening institutional capacity and ensuring sustainable delivery beyond the project life.
In today’s development cooperation landscape, resources are under pressure. Donor budgets are tightening, and competition for funding is sharper than ever. That means that a strong proposal needs more than a compelling story — it also needs a budget that inspires confidence: accurate, realistic, transparent, and fully aligned with donor requirements.

21 Oct 2025

A winning proposal needs a convincing budget

In today’s development cooperation landscape, resources are under pressure. Donor budgets are tightening, and competition for funding is sharper than ever. That means that a strong proposal needs more than a compelling story — it also needs a budget that inspires confidence: accurate, realistic, transparent, and fully aligned with donor requirements. Yet, we notice that in the process many organisations face a familiar challenge: with deadlines approaching the technical teams focus on the narrative, the result chain and the negotiations with project partners. Last minute changes are pushed towards the under capacitated financial staff to be included in the budget. The result? Stress, inefficiencies, errors, or worse: missed opportunities or rejected proposals. That’s where we can help.